<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ziarra.net/clean-energy-solutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ziarra.net</link>
	<description>Green energy, health and mobile technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: niel</title>
		<link>http://ziarra.net/comment-page-3/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[niel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 15:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ziarra.wordpress.com/?page_id=39#comment-210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wind energy and solar energy are clean sources of power but they cannot replace coal or thermal plants in the interim period. They just produce too little power. I support more investment in nuclear power production because of the ability of nuclear plants to generate huge electricity per plant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind energy and solar energy are clean sources of power but they cannot replace coal or thermal plants in the interim period. They just produce too little power. I support more investment in nuclear power production because of the ability of nuclear plants to generate huge electricity per plant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tann</title>
		<link>http://ziarra.net/comment-page-3/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ziarra.wordpress.com/?page_id=39#comment-85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fossil fuel subsidies are 12 times support for renewables, according to a study done in the US. one more reason why this climate matter is so political.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fossil fuel subsidies are 12 times support for renewables, according to a study done in the US. one more reason why this climate matter is so political.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yang Hu</title>
		<link>http://ziarra.net/comment-page-3/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang Hu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ziarra.wordpress.com/?page_id=39#comment-48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the main sources of greenhouse gases?

Although greenhouse gas emissions are primarily associated with the burning of fossil fuels (chiefly, coal, oil and natural gas), they come from many sources. As a result, any effort to reduce the human impact on the climate will need to engage all sectors of society.

The largest contributors to total U.S. emissions are the electricity generation and transportation sectors; significant emissions also come from other commercial and agricultural activity and from residential and industrial buildings.

Most emissions come from a relatively small number of countries. The seven largest emitters—the United States, the European Union (EU), China, Russia, Japan, India and Canada—accounted for more than 70% of energy-related CO2 emissions in 2004. An effective strategy to avert dangerous climate change requires commitments and action by all the world’s major economies.

The United States, with 5% of the world’s population, is responsible for 25% of global GHG emissions, more than any other country. On an intensity basis (emissions per gross domestic product or GDP), U.S. emissions are roughly 50% higher than the European Union’s or Japan’s. On a per capita basis, U.S. emissions are roughly twice as high as those of the EU and Japan (and five times the world average). U.S. emissions are projected to rise 8% above 2004 levels by 2010 (and 28% by 2025). By comparison, emissions are projected to hold steady in the EU, and decline 5% in Japan, by 2010.

Emissions are rising fastest in developing countries. China’s emissions are projected to nearly double, and India’s to increase an estimated 80%, by 2025. Annual emissions from all developing countries are projected to surpass those of developed countries between 2013 and 2018. Their per capita emissions, however, will remain much lower than those of developed countries. In 2025, per capita emissions in China are expected to be one-fourth—and in India, one-fourteenth — those of the United States.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the main sources of greenhouse gases?</p>
<p>Although greenhouse gas emissions are primarily associated with the burning of fossil fuels (chiefly, coal, oil and natural gas), they come from many sources. As a result, any effort to reduce the human impact on the climate will need to engage all sectors of society.</p>
<p>The largest contributors to total U.S. emissions are the electricity generation and transportation sectors; significant emissions also come from other commercial and agricultural activity and from residential and industrial buildings.</p>
<p>Most emissions come from a relatively small number of countries. The seven largest emitters—the United States, the European Union (EU), China, Russia, Japan, India and Canada—accounted for more than 70% of energy-related CO2 emissions in 2004. An effective strategy to avert dangerous climate change requires commitments and action by all the world’s major economies.</p>
<p>The United States, with 5% of the world’s population, is responsible for 25% of global GHG emissions, more than any other country. On an intensity basis (emissions per gross domestic product or GDP), U.S. emissions are roughly 50% higher than the European Union’s or Japan’s. On a per capita basis, U.S. emissions are roughly twice as high as those of the EU and Japan (and five times the world average). U.S. emissions are projected to rise 8% above 2004 levels by 2010 (and 28% by 2025). By comparison, emissions are projected to hold steady in the EU, and decline 5% in Japan, by 2010.</p>
<p>Emissions are rising fastest in developing countries. China’s emissions are projected to nearly double, and India’s to increase an estimated 80%, by 2025. Annual emissions from all developing countries are projected to surpass those of developed countries between 2013 and 2018. Their per capita emissions, however, will remain much lower than those of developed countries. In 2025, per capita emissions in China are expected to be one-fourth—and in India, one-fourteenth — those of the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dext</title>
		<link>http://ziarra.net/comment-page-2/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dext]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ziarra.wordpress.com/?page_id=39#comment-41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The greenhouse effect, how does it work?
A simplified explanation of the greenhouse effect is as follows:
Shortwave solar radiation [various rays from the sun] can pass through the clear atmosphere without hindrance, but long wave infrared radiation emitted by the warm surface of the Earth is absorbed partially and then re-emitted back to earth by a number of gases - carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone  etc in the cooler atmosphere above.  This causes rise in earth’s temperatures and may cause increase in droughts, arctic ice melting, among other harmful effects.
NOTE: infra-red is type of unseen rays like those from jiko, cooker etc which make us feel warm.

The main sources of CO2 are: 
Solid fuels (e.g., coal): 35%
Liquid fuels (e.g., gasoline, fuel oil): 36%
Gaseous fuels (e.g., natural gas): 20%
Currently there is an increase in greenhouse effect because of an increase in the
concentrations of greenhouse gases due to human activities. This causes “global
warming” [a rise in mean earth temperatures] plus other damaging climate changes; for example, changes in precipitation, storm patterns, and rise in the level of the oceans. 
Basically, greenhouse effect can be summarized thus:
1. Solar radiation passes through the clear atmosphere. 
2. Most radiation is absorbed by the Earth&#039;s surface and warms it. 
3. Some solar radiation is reflected by the Earth and the atmosphere. 
4. Infrared radiation is emitted from the Earth&#039;s surface. 
5. Some of the infrared radiation is absorbed and re-emitted back to earth by the greenhouse gases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The greenhouse effect, how does it work?<br />
A simplified explanation of the greenhouse effect is as follows:<br />
Shortwave solar radiation [various rays from the sun] can pass through the clear atmosphere without hindrance, but long wave infrared radiation emitted by the warm surface of the Earth is absorbed partially and then re-emitted back to earth by a number of gases &#8211; carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone  etc in the cooler atmosphere above.  This causes rise in earth’s temperatures and may cause increase in droughts, arctic ice melting, among other harmful effects.<br />
NOTE: infra-red is type of unseen rays like those from jiko, cooker etc which make us feel warm.</p>
<p>The main sources of CO2 are:<br />
Solid fuels (e.g., coal): 35%<br />
Liquid fuels (e.g., gasoline, fuel oil): 36%<br />
Gaseous fuels (e.g., natural gas): 20%<br />
Currently there is an increase in greenhouse effect because of an increase in the<br />
concentrations of greenhouse gases due to human activities. This causes “global<br />
warming” [a rise in mean earth temperatures] plus other damaging climate changes; for example, changes in precipitation, storm patterns, and rise in the level of the oceans.<br />
Basically, greenhouse effect can be summarized thus:<br />
1. Solar radiation passes through the clear atmosphere.<br />
2. Most radiation is absorbed by the Earth&#8217;s surface and warms it.<br />
3. Some solar radiation is reflected by the Earth and the atmosphere.<br />
4. Infrared radiation is emitted from the Earth&#8217;s surface.<br />
5. Some of the infrared radiation is absorbed and re-emitted back to earth by the greenhouse gases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estelle</title>
		<link>http://ziarra.net/comment-page-2/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Estelle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ziarra.wordpress.com/?page_id=39#comment-39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though we wish it would, global warming will not go away. Big Industry must open its eyes and see that their efforts to make it into the largest urban legend the world has ever seen, will not pay off. The earth is dying and the day it finally gives way we will not need what big industry produce any longer. I don&#039;t understand why they can&#039;t see it as a way to preserve the marketplace!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though we wish it would, global warming will not go away. Big Industry must open its eyes and see that their efforts to make it into the largest urban legend the world has ever seen, will not pay off. The earth is dying and the day it finally gives way we will not need what big industry produce any longer. I don&#8217;t understand why they can&#8217;t see it as a way to preserve the marketplace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

